Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Wisconsin

Midland Packaging and Display

Franksville, WI · ~120 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midland Packaging and Display runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Midland Packaging and Display: 0.8 TCR = 23% of Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midland Packaging and Display safety composite

Midland Packaging and Display scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Midland Packaging and Display: 0.7 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.05× in 2024

Midland Packaging and Display's TCR rose 0.9 from 0.7 in 2022 to 1.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Franksville, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #10/53
  • PHOTO Pratt (Jet Corr), Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pratt (Jet Corr), Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Midland Packaging and Display in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midland Packaging and Display averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midland Packaging and Display TCR series: 2022=0.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Midland Packaging and Display falls in its industry

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugate establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 53 Shipping containers, corrugate employers in Wisconsin.

Midland Packaging and Display (120 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Midland Packaging and Display
Midland Packaging and Display (120 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Midland Packaging and Display has more employees than the Shipping containers, corrugated, made fr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · WI · Franksville

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 28 employers in Franksville, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Jet Corr), Inc 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurens Container 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4354 Bradenton Container 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Midwest Sheets 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Creekwood 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Breeder Farms 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE STgenetics-Fond du Lac 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE A-1 Excavating LLC 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unico, LLC 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franksville 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR MNA - Wisconsin 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Recycling, Inc. 142 FTE
NAT-TCR Russell City Energy Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vcf 049 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bates Engineers 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Valero Renewable Fuels Company, LLC dba Valero Aurora Plant 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE SFI 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Strip, Inc. Headquarters 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE BASF Engineering Plastics Compounding 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE WESCO Industries 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.