Corrugated and Fiber Box Manufacturing · California

4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging

Tulare, CA · ~118 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Corrugated and Fiber Box Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging: 4.0 TCR = 122% of Corrugated and Fiber Box Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging safety composite

4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2019→2022

4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging injury rate improved

4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging's TCR fell 0.8 from 4.1 in 2019 to 3.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.1 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Tulare, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 122% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #79/111
  • PHOTO SALISBURY, NC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SALISBURY, NC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging averages 4.0 TCR (122% of the Corrugated and Fiber Box Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging TCR series: 2019=4.1 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where 4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and Fiber Box Manuf establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 111 Corrugated and Fiber Box Manuf employers in California.

4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging (118 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate 4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging
4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging (118 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

4586 Tulare Food Service Packaging has more employees than the Corrugated and Fiber Box Manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.3 1.6 4 0 0
2021 7.9 3.5 9 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 4.1 4.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · CA · Tulare

1,338 Corrugated and Fiber Box Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 130 employers in Tulare, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SALISBURY, NC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BCII 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fontana Distribution 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The BoxMaker, Inc., Kent 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prestige Farming inc 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cipponeri Orchards 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHC Facilities, Inc. dba The Plug DTLA 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plug Connection - Lodi 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Ag Personnel Management Inc. 8,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cal Enterprise Labor Solutions, Inc. 5,974 FTE
CITY-NEAR Golden State Ag Services, Inc. 5,846 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Labor Services, Inc. 2,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Bradford Soap - IN 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnny Rocket's #261 Bally's 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Bassett Med Cntr Es 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tony's Finer Foods-567 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0034-0034-00778 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0034-0034-00773 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE MercyOne North Iowa Medical Center West 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wolkow Braker Roofing Corp. 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.