Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

El Camino Gardens

Carmichael, CA · ~118 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

El Camino Gardens runs at 462% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

El Camino Gardens: 17.6 TCR = 462% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

El Camino Gardens safety composite

El Camino Gardens scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.0

2017→2023

El Camino Gardens injury rate improved

El Camino Gardens's TCR fell 11.0 from 24.4 in 2017 to 13.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 26.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=24.4 · 2019=9.4 · 2020=26.1 · 2022=14.4 · 2023=13.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Carmichael, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.6 · 462% of ind

  • DART 9.0 DART
  • RANK #548/635
  • PHOTO Biddeford Estates
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Biddeford Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

El Camino Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows El Camino Gardens averages 17.6 TCR (462% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

El Camino Gardens TCR series: 2017=24.4 · 2019=9.4 · 2020=26.1 · 2022=14.4 · 2023=13.5 · BLS 3.8

Where El Camino Gardens falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #548 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

El Camino Gardens (118 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate El Camino Gardens
El Camino Gardens (118 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

El Camino Gardens has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 13.5 9.0 11 1 0
2022 14.4 13.3 4 9 0
2020 26.1 22.4 6 22 0
2019 9.4 6.6 10 0 0
2017 24.4 11.7 24 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Carmichael

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 48 employers in Carmichael, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Biddeford Estates 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone at Canton 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Branford 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodlands Senior Living of Lewiston LLC 17.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prestige Farming inc 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cipponeri Orchards 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHC Facilities, Inc. dba The Plug DTLA 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plug Connection - Lodi 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR San Juan Unified School District 6,739 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030163 2,683 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy San Juan Medical Center 2,421 FTE
CITY-NEAR 06-155997292-3 2,401 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1263 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 196 St. John (Jacksonville 2) 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-BOI-BOISE-BOI-PDMT 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Atlanta North Johns Creek 17.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE TOW By Fanatics 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Forum at the Crossing 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Orleans Iron Works, L.L.C. 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sjoberg Tool & Manufacturing Corp. 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.