Gas tanks asembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Texas

4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies

Roanoke, TX · ~53 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Gas tanks asembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies: 4.1 TCR = 75% of Gas tanks asembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies safety composite

4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2021

4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies injury rate improved

4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies's TCR fell 1.3 from 6.7 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Roanoke, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.1 · 75% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #17/30
  • PHOTO Hyundai Mobis Alabama
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hyundai Mobis Alabama (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies averages 4.1 TCR (75% of the Gas tanks asembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=5.4 · BLS 5.4

Where 4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies falls in its industry

772 Gas tanks asembled, automotive establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 30 Gas tanks asembled, automotive employers in Texas.

4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies (53 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies
4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies (53 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

4598-Momentum Fuel Technologies has fewer employees than the Gas tanks asembled, automotive, truck, a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.4 4.1 3 1 0
2020 6.4 3.8 3 2 0
2019 5.8 3.9 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.7 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · TX · Roanoke

772 Gas tanks asembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 70 employers in Roanoke, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hyundai Mobis Alabama 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Michigan Holland 10985 Chicago Dr 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magna Modular Systems LLC dba AIM Systems 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Del Rio Distribution Center 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE XIT Feeders 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolf Creek Feedyard 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Cattle Feeders, LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glasscock County Coop 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8027688-Callaway Golf 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oscar Renda Contracting Inc.-Company Wide 680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oscar Renda Contracting, Inc. 642 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8027688 Callaway Golf 640 FTE
NAT-TCR Tower Electric, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartland Health Care Center Prosperity Oaks 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacks Essexville 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR En Fuego Construction, LLC 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heritage Manor - Robinson #136 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pavestone - PHLP 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE US033: Allied - Kokomo 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rinchem Company, Inc. CSC 80 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.