Scheduled Air Transportation · California

4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2

Los Angeles, CA · ~190 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2 runs at 330% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Scheduled Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade F.

4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2: 14.8 TCR = 330% of Scheduled Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2 safety composite

4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2: 9.5 → 15.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 19.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2022

4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2's TCR rose 6.2 from 9.5 in 2020 to 15.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 19.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.8 · 330% of ind

  • DART 11.9 DART
  • RANK #149/177
  • PHOTO 76120008--SEATTLE DE…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 63 inj
  • SIZE ~190 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 76120008--SEATTLE DELTA CAB CLEAN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2 averages 14.8 TCR (330% of the Scheduled Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2 TCR series: 2020=9.5 · 2021=19.3 · 2022=15.7 · BLS 4.5

Where 4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2 falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Air Transportation establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #149 safest of 177 Scheduled Air Transportation employers in California.

4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2 (190 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2
4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2 (190 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

4795-Aa-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Crg2 has more employees than the Scheduled Air Transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 15.7 11.9 22 3 0
2021 19.3 16.6 25 4 0
2020 9.5 8.3 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · CA · Los Angeles

1,568 Scheduled Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 76120008--SEATTLE DELTA CAB CLEAN 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Rosa Horizon 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-PD-RIC-RICHMOND-PD 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-DFW-DALLAS FORT WORTH-EAGLE FLIGHT SERVICE 15.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zuckerman Family Farms 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Santa Margarita Water District 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE City Of Sacramento-Field Services Division Roll-Up (140014) 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Courtney Inc. 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Billco Corporation 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-04512 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Absopure Water Company LLC #19 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0363 14.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Calumet Montana Refining 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at the Citadel - Mess Hall 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highlands Living Center 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE US - Distribution Center Network : 0945 190 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.