Store · California

Sacramento-Elk Grove #037

Elk Grove, CA · ~190 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.2
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sacramento-Elk Grove #037 runs at 624% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Store workplace, earning a grade F.

Sacramento-Elk Grove #037: 21.2 TCR = 624% of Store BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sacramento-Elk Grove #037 safety composite

Sacramento-Elk Grove #037 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2023

Sacramento-Elk Grove #037 injury rate improved

Sacramento-Elk Grove #037's TCR fell 3.8 from 20.4 in 2016 to 16.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 27.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.4 · 2017=27.1 · 2018=18.5 · 2019=23.3 · 2020=23.6 · 2021=19.3 · 2022=20.9 · 2023=16.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Elk Grove, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 21.2 · 624% of ind

  • DART 11.6 DART
  • RANK #4588/4686
  • PHOTO Moses Lake #141
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 239 inj
  • SIZE ~190 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moses Lake #141 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sacramento-Elk Grove #037 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sacramento-Elk Grove #037 averages 21.2 TCR (624% of the Store BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sacramento-Elk Grove #037 TCR series: 2016=20.4 · 2017=27.1 · 2018=18.5 · 2019=23.3 · 2020=23.6 · 2021=19.3 · 2022=20.9 · 2023=16.7 · BLS 3.4

Where Sacramento-Elk Grove #037 falls in its industry

30,654 Store establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4588 safest of 4686 Store employers in California.

Sacramento-Elk Grove #037 (190 employees, TCR 21.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sacramento-Elk Grove #037
Sacramento-Elk Grove #037 (190 employees, TCR 21.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Sacramento-Elk Grove #037 has more employees than the Store median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 16.7 11.6 23 0 0
2022 20.9 17.3 29 0 0
2021 19.3 14.4 28 0 0
2020 23.6 19.7 36 0 0
2019 23.3 20.4 33 0 0
2018 18.5 15.0 26 0 0
2017 27.1 22.9 35 4 0
2016 20.4 13.6 29 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · CA · Elk Grove

30,654 Store employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 134 employers in Elk Grove, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moses Lake #141 21.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0027 Rcho Santa Margarita 21.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0613 Cherry Hill 21.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SWN 60 21.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zuckerman Family Farms 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Santa Margarita Water District 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE City Of Sacramento-Field Services Division Roll-Up (140014) 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Courtney Inc. 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - Sacramento 2,924 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 601 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CCHCS - 042 1,408 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - ELK GROVE 1,404 FTE
NAT-TCR Moses Lake #141 21.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Water - Construction / Distribution 21.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Devil Dog Delivery 21.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Txhar - Harlingen 21.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carlisle Pa Plant 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2007 St Cloud Distrib Center (Mn) 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nashville Resource Center - PNG 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Hardware Distributing Co - Distribution Center 190 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.