Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation · North Carolina

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT

Fayetteville, NC · ~27 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT runs at 336% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade F.

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT: 15.1 TCR = 336% of Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT safety composite

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2019→2022

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT injury rate improved

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT's TCR fell 5.7 from 14.9 in 2019 to 9.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 26.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=14.9 · 2020=26.3 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=9.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Fayetteville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.1 · 336% of ind

  • DART 9.2 DART
  • RANK #42/46
  • PHOTO LIT - Ground Ops
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LIT - Ground Ops (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT averages 15.1 TCR (336% of the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT TCR series: 2019=14.9 · 2020=26.3 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=9.2 · BLS 4.5

Where 4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 46 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp employers in North Carolina.

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT (27 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT
4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT (27 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT has fewer employees than the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.2 9.2 2 0 0
2021 10.2 5.1 2 0 0
2020 26.3 15.8 4 1 0
2019 14.9 11.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · NC · Fayetteville

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 317 employers in Fayetteville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LIT - Ground Ops 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-SW-20730090-CS 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR IAD - Ground Ops 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-PD-ABE-ALLENTOWN-ABE-PDMT 15.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bissette Farms, Inc 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyde County Pullet Farm 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyde County Pullet 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Price Logging Inc 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Fear Valley Health System/Cumberland County 5,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company - Fayetteville 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Cumberland 2,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Fayetteville 2,044 FTE
NAT-TCR HG766 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-00336 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01762 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-AHSCM17 15.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Another Plumbing Company LLC 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wyoming Excavators Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenpoint Ag-Covington-Fertilizer Plant 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.