Electrical contractors · California

Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan

Fresno, CA · ~27 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan: 5.2 TCR = 184% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan safety composite

Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2022

Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan injury rate improved

Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan's TCR fell 4.7 from 7.9 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=11.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=13.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 184% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #393/548
  • PHOTO Cape Fear Solar Syst…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cape Fear Solar Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan averages 5.2 TCR (184% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan TCR series: 2016=7.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=11 · 2019=0 · 2020=13.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #393 safest of 548 Electrical contractors employers in California.

Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan (27 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan
Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan (27 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Harris Electric 4679 N. El Capitan has fewer employees than the Electrical contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.3 3.3 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 13.9 10.4 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 11.0 0.0 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.9 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · Fresno

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cape Fear Solar Systems 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renton Office 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baker Brothers 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR House of Power Electric, LC 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE HQ 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medeiros Farms Vineyards 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAND RANCH 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Bernabe Vineyards 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0649 Mountaire Farms - Millsboro 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Thybar Akron 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Y Foods, Inc. Chicopee 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Y Foods, Inc. North Branford 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greenpoint Ag-Covington-Fertilizer Plant 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coronado Surgery Center 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-FAY-PDMT 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-Pd-Ewn-New Bern-Ewn-Pdmt 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.