Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation · North Carolina

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD

Fayetteville, NC · ~25 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade C.

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD: 4.4 TCR = 98% of Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD safety composite

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2018

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD injury rate improved

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD's TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=8.7 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Fayetteville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 98% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/46
  • PHOTO Endeavor Air, Inc. -…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Endeavor Air, Inc. - ATL Flight Operations and Inflight Base (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD averages 4.4 TCR (98% of the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=8.7 · 2018=0 · BLS 4.5

Where 4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 46 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp employers in North Carolina.

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD (25 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD
4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD (25 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD has fewer employees than the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 8.7 8.7 2 0 0
2016 4.6 4.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · NC · Fayetteville

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 317 employers in Fayetteville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Endeavor Air, Inc. - ATL Flight Operations and Inflight Base 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-PD-MGM-MONTGOMERY-MGM-PDMT 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TYS 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fair View Nursery, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE John William Carter III 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hill of Berry's 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrew Tyson Farms 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Fear Valley Health System/Cumberland County 5,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company - Fayetteville 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Cumberland 2,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Fayetteville 2,044 FTE
NAT-TCR International Paper - Three Rivers Container 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Conner Lugoff SC Plant 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SCC of Pilgrim Manor Rehabilitation Center 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 3827 Spring Grove Av 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4795-Pd-Lgb-Long Beach-Pd 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-Pd-Swf-Stewart Airport-Pd 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Race Brothers Farm Supply 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2073-EJ-20730192-MX 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.