Air passenger carriers, scheduled · Alaska

ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance

Anchorage, AK · ~88 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Air passenger carriers, scheduled workplace, earning a grade C.

ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance: 4.4 TCR = 98% of Air passenger carriers, scheduled BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance safety composite

ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance: 0.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 7.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.21× in 2024

ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Anchorage, AK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 98% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #10/21
  • PHOTO Endeavor Air, Inc. -…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Endeavor Air, Inc. - ATL Flight Operations and Inflight Base (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance averages 4.4 TCR (98% of the Air passenger carriers, scheduled BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=7 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance falls in its industry

1,568 Air passenger carriers, schedu establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 21 Air passenger carriers, schedu employers in Alaska.

ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance (88 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance
ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance (88 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

ANC Alaska Airlines Maintenance has fewer employees than the Air passenger carriers, scheduled median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 0.9 3 0 0
2023 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2022 2.3 0.0 2 0 0
2021 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2020 7.0 5.6 5 0 0
2019 7.8 3.1 5 0 0
2018 7.1 5.7 5 0 0
2017 7.3 5.8 5 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · AK · Anchorage

1,568 Air passenger carriers, scheduled employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 704 employers in Anchorage, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Endeavor Air, Inc. - ATL Flight Operations and Inflight Base 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-PD-FAY-FAYETTEVILLE-PD 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TYS 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6925-SFO 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 105304 - JBER Runway Extension16/34 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leader Creek Fisheries - Naknek 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWY-0027-0027-00548 FAC-00548-SOLDOTNA-AK 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000198 4,453 FTE
CITY-NEAR AK10 PROVIDENCE ALASKA MEDICAL CTR-ANCHORAGE 2,864 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alaska Native Medical Center 2,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR GCI Communication Corp. 1,935 FTE
NAT-TCR TN 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Excel Electrical Technologies, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Galbreath LLC 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Spooky Nook Sports Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Pointe 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Drucker Diagnostics 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.M. Jones Lumber Company 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cornerstone at Canton 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.