Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · Florida

505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf

Lantana, FL · ~64 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf runs at 266% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf: 10.1 TCR = 266% of Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf safety composite

505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf: 6.8 → 13.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 13.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2024

505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf's TCR rose 6.6 from 6.8 in 2023 to 13.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Lantana, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 266% of ind

  • DART 13.4 DART
  • RANK #64/92
  • PHOTO 1435 48 GILBERT AVENUE
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1435 48 GILBERT AVENUE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf averages 10.1 TCR (266% of the Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf TCR series: 2023=6.8 · 2024=13.4 · BLS 3.8

Where 505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf falls in its industry

2,261 Residential Intellectual and D establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 92 Residential Intellectual and D employers in Florida.

505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf (64 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf
505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf (64 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

505538 010730_flamingo Dr Cluster_idd Icf has fewer employees than the Residential Intellectual and Development median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.4 13.4 8 0 0
2023 6.8 3.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · FL · Lantana

2,261 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 24 employers in Lantana, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1435 48 GILBERT AVENUE 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Black Forest home 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Old Hawleyville 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turner Lane 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE AIREKO ENERGY SOLUTIONS US LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Gate Service Center 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Division - Orlando 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Hill Group 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vi at Lakeside Village 257 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0180 - LANTANA FL WHSE 248 FTE
CITY-NEAR Image Skincare 216 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carlisle Palm Beach 164 FTE
NAT-TCR Reno 10502 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Retreat at Gaffney 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ALBANY 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR BCI Acrylic, Inc 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE STR0616 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA-Southern Region Office C 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Noland Hospital Tuscaloosa 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ontario Warehouse 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.