Other Urban Transit Systems · California

513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca

Burlingame, CA · ~77 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Other Urban Transit Systems workplace, earning a grade F.

513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca: 9.9 TCR = 219% of Other Urban Transit Systems BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca safety composite

513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.6

2018→2020

513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca injury rate improved

513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca's TCR fell 13.6 from 16.6 in 2018 to 3.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=16.6 · 2020=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485119 · Burlingame, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 219% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #73/79
  • PHOTO 228 Gsu Panther Expr…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 228 Gsu Panther Express Ga (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca averages 9.9 TCR (219% of the Other Urban Transit Systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca TCR series: 2018=16.6 · 2020=3.1 · BLS 4.5

Where 513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca falls in its industry

179 Other Urban Transit Systems establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 79 Other Urban Transit Systems employers in California.

513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca (77 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca
513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca (77 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 4.0

513 - Uber Wav San Francisco, Ca has fewer employees than the Other Urban Transit Systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2018 16.6 11.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485119 · CA · Burlingame

179 Other Urban Transit Systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 93 employers in Burlingame, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 228 Gsu Panther Express Ga 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 115 - Tulare County (Tcat), Ca 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 291 - Escondido Ca 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 299 Baton Rouge 2 La 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Innovative Produce, LP 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bokisch Vineyard Management 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bassman 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE COR Chico Business Office 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mills-Peninsula Medical Center (360-22) 1,835 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Bay Hospitals (30191) 1,765 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2453-00060388-60388 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO-SPUSA 512 FTE
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : HOU3 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MGE3 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lafayette Pointe Nursing & Rehab Center 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Nizhoni Health Systems LLC - Framingham 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saint-Gobain CertainTeed Roofing - Ennis 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cargill Agricultural Supply Chain - Wichita 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dixie White House Health and Rehabilitation Center 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Force One, Inc. (Support Group) 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.