Computer Manufacture · California

6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove

Elk Grove, CA · ~1,404 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove runs at 4% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Computer Manufacture workplace, earning a grade A.

6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove: 0.1 TCR = 4% of Computer Manufacture BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove safety composite

6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove held a steady TCR band

6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.2 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.2 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334111 · Elk Grove, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 4% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #3/33
  • PHOTO Snap-on Diagnostics
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~1,404 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Snap-on Diagnostics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove averages 0.1 TCR (4% of the Computer Manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove TCR series: 2016=0.2 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0.1 · BLS 3.3

Where 6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove falls in its industry

114 Computer Manufacture establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 33 Computer Manufacture employers in California.

6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove (1,404 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 236 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate 6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove
6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove (1,404 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 236 employees and a TCR of 0.7

6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Elk Grove has more employees than the Computer Manufacture median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2017 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2016 0.2 0.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334111 · CA · Elk Grove

114 Computer Manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 134 employers in Elk Grove, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Snap-on Diagnostics 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AGD 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hewlett Packard Caribe BV 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Torrance Facility 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6403-64030211 1,404 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3469_6645 1,405 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2032-08180577 1,406 FTE
STATE-SIZE District 8 1,402 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - Sacramento 2,924 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 601 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CCHCS - 042 1,408 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS) 042 1,203 FTE
NAT-TCR MS - Enterprise, AL - 5FTRU 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR JFSNA at ExxonMobil Baytown Complex 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Nexeo Solutions - The Woodlands 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate - DENVER 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Covenant Medical Center 1,404 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Regional Medical Center 1,404 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Systems 1,404 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sharonville (Ohsha) 1,405 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.