General warehousing and storage · Texas

60562 - Capstone Sysco Central

New Braunfels, TX · ~56 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

60562 - Capstone Sysco Central runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

60562 - Capstone Sysco Central: 1.4 TCR = 24% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

60562 - Capstone Sysco Central safety composite

60562 - Capstone Sysco Central scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2018→2024

60562 - Capstone Sysco Central injury rate improved

60562 - Capstone Sysco Central's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.5 · 2019=2.0 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · New Braunfels, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #189/846
  • PHOTO USA GA Buford DSC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: USA GA Buford DSC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

60562 - Capstone Sysco Central in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 60562 - Capstone Sysco Central averages 1.4 TCR (24% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

60562 - Capstone Sysco Central TCR series: 2018=2.5 · 2019=2 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where 60562 - Capstone Sysco Central falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #189 safest of 846 General warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

60562 - Capstone Sysco Central (56 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 60562 - Capstone Sysco Central
60562 - Capstone Sysco Central (56 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

60562 - Capstone Sysco Central has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · New Braunfels

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 183 employers in New Braunfels, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR USA GA Buford DSC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deluxe Freight, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR INTERFACE FLOR LLC - WAREHOUSE 19 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 15333 Hempstead Highway Houston TX 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Native Texas Nursery 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dalhart Cattle Feeders 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oasis Gin, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Comyn GP Shelling Plant 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schlitterbahn Waterparks and Resort - New Braunfels 1,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6016 1,026 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6016 1,025 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Central Texas 1,004 FTE
NAT-TCR Colecraft Commercial Furnishings 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Capitol Projects, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacobs - PEMBROKE PINES -OMI 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Interface Flor LLC - Warehouse 19 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Nmsu Crossroads Food Court 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Fnf Fm Cleaning Services 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Green Components 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Far West Recycling - NE Portland 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.