Local Messengers and Local Delivery · California

6458-CHIN

Chino, CA · ~974 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
30.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

6458-CHIN runs at 678% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Local Messengers and Local Delivery workplace, earning a grade F.

6458-CHIN: 30.5 TCR = 678% of Local Messengers and Local Delivery BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

6458-CHIN safety composite

6458-CHIN scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 30.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 26.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2021→2022

6458-CHIN injury rate improved

6458-CHIN's TCR fell 4.4 from 32.7 in 2021 to 28.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 32.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=32.7 · 2022=28.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Chino, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 30.5 · 678% of ind

  • DART 26.2 DART
  • RANK #168/168
  • PHOTO 6458-ZPOR
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 341 inj
  • SIZE ~974 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6458-ZPOR (0.6 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

6458-CHIN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 6458-CHIN averages 30.5 TCR (678% of the Local Messengers and Local Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

6458-CHIN TCR series: 2021=32.7 · 2022=28.3 · BLS 4.5

Where 6458-CHIN falls in its industry

1,452 Local Messengers and Local Del establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #168 safest of 168 Local Messengers and Local Del employers in California.

6458-CHIN (974 employees, TCR 30.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate 6458-CHIN
6458-CHIN (974 employees, TCR 30.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

6458-CHIN has more employees than the Local Messengers and Local Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 28.3 26.2 186 16 0
2021 32.7 30.8 155 16 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · CA · Chino

1,452 Local Messengers and Local Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZPOR 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMART SOLUTIONS AND LOGISTICS LLC AT DWS4 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZVEN 29.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TPLO Corp. 29.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE YAMAMOTO RANCH 973 FTE
STATE-SIZE Honeywell Torrance 975 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 7033 973 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Escondido 975 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4078 2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8103 2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4078 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Institution for Men 1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE FSC II, LLC dba Fred Smith Company 974 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cuyuna Regional Crosby Hospital Services 974 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ozarks Medical Center 974 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - ABE4 974 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.