Correctional institutions · California

California Institution for Men

Chino, CA · ~1,680 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
5
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

California Institution for Men runs at 567% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade F.

California Institution for Men: 18.1 TCR = 567% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

California Institution for Men safety composite

California Institution for Men scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 36% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 5

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−584.3

2017→2024

California Institution for Men injury rate improved

California Institution for Men's TCR fell 584.3 from 595.0 in 2017 to 10.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 627.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=595.0 · 2018=627.2 · 2019=12.7 · 2020=27.2 · 2022=27.1 · 2023=13.0 · 2024=10.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Chino, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 18.1 · 567% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #61/73
  • PHOTO CDC MULE CREEK STATE…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1,127 inj
  • SIZE ~1,680 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CDC MULE CREEK STATE PRISON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

California Institution for Men in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows California Institution for Men averages 18.1 TCR (567% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

California Institution for Men TCR series: 2017=595 · 2018=627.2 · 2019=12.7 · 2020=27.2 · 2022=27.1 · 2023=13 · 2024=10.7 · BLS 3.2

Where California Institution for Men falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 73 Correctional institutions employers in California.

California Institution for Men (1,680 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate California Institution for Men
California Institution for Men (1,680 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

California Institution for Men has more employees than the Correctional institutions median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.7 4.5 177 4 0
2023 13.0 5.8 175 45 2
2022 27.1 21.0 132 309 0
2020 27.2 21.1 138 331 2
2019 12.7 5.8 177 54 0
2018 627.2 330.8 164 54 0
2017 595.0 288.9 164 44 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · CA · Chino

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CDC MULE CREEK STATE PRISON 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN Dept of Corrections - Rush City 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisville Jefferson County Metro Govt - Corrections - Main Jail 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gus Harrison Correctional Facility 18.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Teradata 1,680 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 80 1,679 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 196 1,679 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 520 1,679 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4078 2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8103 2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4078 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR SharkNinja Operating LLC 1,085 FTE
NAT-TCR M&B Environmental, Inc. 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Concord,NC-4389 Republic 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Forestdale Park 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shiocton Cut Stock LLC 18.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Christus Spohn Shoreline-110 1,681 FTE
NAT-SIZE OSF Saint Anthony Medical Center 1,679 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora BayCare Medical Center 1,679 FTE
NAT-SIZE Therapy Services 1,681 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.