Materials recovery facilities (MRF) · California
653 Charles (MRF)
San Jose, CA · ~271 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 6.2
- Avg TCR
- 2.6
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
653 Charles (MRF) runs at 237% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Materials recovery facilities (MRF) workplace, earning a grade F.
653 Charles (MRF): 6.2 TCR = 237% of Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)
653 Charles (MRF) safety composite
653 Charles (MRF) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
45/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 6.17 per 100 workers
Safer than 28% of industry peers
- DART rate
- C 0.87 per 100 workers
Safer than 59% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−11.4
2021→2024
653 Charles (MRF) injury rate improved
653 Charles (MRF)'s TCR fell 11.4 from 13.4 in 2021 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2021=13.4 · 2022=7.0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 562920 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · MID
Grade F · TCR 6.2 · 237% of ind
- DART 0.9 DART
- RANK #26/45
- PHOTO S09091 - Allentown MRF
- BOOK 4y book
- INJ 81 inj
- SIZE ~271 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: S09091 - Allentown MRF (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →
653 Charles (MRF) in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
653 Charles (MRF)
6.2 TCR
- S09091 - Allen
S09091 - Allentown MRF
6.2 TCR
- CSR Harrisburg
CSR Harrisburg
6.2 TCR
- We Recycle Sol
We Recycle Solar, Inc.
6.1 TCR
- g2 Revolution,
g2 Revolution, LLC Lake Zurich
6.1 TCR
What this shows 653 Charles (MRF) averages 6.2 TCR (237% of the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS benchmark).
653 Charles (MRF) TCR series: 2021=13.4 · 2022=7 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2 · BLS 2.6
Where 653 Charles (MRF) falls in its industry
422 Materials recovery facilities establishmentsSafer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 45 Materials recovery facilities employers in California.
653 Charles (MRF) has more employees than the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
| 2022 | 7.0 | 3.3 | 23 | 2 | 0 |
| 2021 | 13.4 | 7.7 | 44 | 3 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
562920 · CA · San Jose
422 Materials recovery facilities (MRF) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.