Assisted Living Facilities w/o on-site Nursing Care Facilities · Tennessee

6848-68480001-000069

Union City, TN · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

6848-68480001-000069 runs at 560% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facilities w/o on-site Nursing Care Facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

6848-68480001-000069: 21.3 TCR = 560% of Assisted Living Facilities w/o on-site Nursing Care Facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

6848-68480001-000069 safety composite

6848-68480001-000069 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−24.9

2017→2020

6848-68480001-000069 injury rate improved

6848-68480001-000069's TCR fell 24.9 from 44.6 in 2017 to 19.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 44.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=44.6 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=19.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Union City, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.3 · 560% of ind

  • DART 13.1 DART
  • RANK #99/100
  • PHOTO Aegis of Lynnwood
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aegis of Lynnwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

6848-68480001-000069 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 6848-68480001-000069 averages 21.3 TCR (560% of the Assisted Living Facilities w/o on-site Nursing Care Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

6848-68480001-000069 TCR series: 2017=44.6 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=19.7 · BLS 3.8

Where 6848-68480001-000069 falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities w/o establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #99 safest of 100 Assisted Living Facilities w/o employers in Tennessee.

6848-68480001-000069 (23 employees, TCR 21.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 6848-68480001-000069
6848-68480001-000069 (23 employees, TCR 21.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

6848-68480001-000069 has fewer employees than the Assisted Living Facilities w/o on-site N median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 19.7 13.1 3 0 0
2019 6.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 14.1 7.1 2 0 0
2017 44.6 29.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TN · Union City

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities w/o on-site Nursing Care Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 44 employers in Union City, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Lynnwood 21.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbia Ridge Senior Living 21.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pasa Alta Holdings, Inc 21.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCAP Salisbury, LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at Salisbury 21.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Manchester DREMC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Tennessee Mechanical Contractors 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDE - Metro Nashville District Energy System 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avenue Construction 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Obion County Plant 1,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Williams Sausage 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hickman Road Plant 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Memorial Hospital - Union City 335 FTE
NAT-TCR Lynmoore at Lawnwood 21.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Building Value 21.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0019-0018-03529 21.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Urban Construction Company 21.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Flohr Machine Company, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Improvements 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hiller Offshore Services, a division of The Hiller Companies, Inc 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE MPW - Location Quebec 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.