Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores · North Carolina

6921-00209

Huntersville, NC · ~127 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

6921-00209 runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores workplace, earning a grade C.

6921-00209: 4.0 TCR = 118% of Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

6921-00209 safety composite

6921-00209 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2016→2023

6921-00209 injury rate improved

6921-00209's TCR fell 5.5 from 7.9 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.9 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Huntersville, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 118% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #1148/1627
  • PHOTO 025-00576
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 025-00576 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

6921-00209 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 6921-00209 averages 4.0 TCR (118% of the Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

6921-00209 TCR series: 2016=7.9 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 3.4

Where 6921-00209 falls in its industry

30,654 Supermarkets and Other Grocery establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1148 safest of 1627 Supermarkets and Other Grocery employers in North Carolina.

6921-00209 (127 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 6921-00209
6921-00209 (127 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

6921-00209 has more employees than the Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except C median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2021 4.6 3.5 4 0 0
2020 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2019 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 7.1 5.7 5 0 0
2017 2.7 1.4 2 0 0
2016 7.9 4.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · NC · Huntersville

30,654 Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 117 employers in Huntersville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 025-00576 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 660-00694 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2050-20500002-413 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6962-SWY 0025 1754 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Saber Healthcare 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE HOT SPRINGS HEALTH PROGRAM, INC. 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aston Park Health Care Center 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Garden Landscaping 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR McGuire Nuclear 1,045 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Huntersville Medical Center 1,002 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huntersville Field Support Center 929 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metrolina Greenhouses - Huntersville NC 725 FTE
NAT-TCR TRG a Division of Alter Trading Rogers 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Twin Oaks Rehabilitation & HealthCare Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Emerald Construction Company 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Radial Rialto 2 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midland Manufacturing 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Lumber and Millwork 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cherry Ridge 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berry Global Washington Georgia Facility 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.