Code Enforcement · North Carolina

6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs

Charlotte, NC · ~459 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Code Enforcement workplace, earning a grade B.

6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs: 2.2 TCR = 70% of Code Enforcement BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs safety composite

6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs: 1.6 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2022

6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.6 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 70% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO Padilla Bay
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~459 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Padilla Bay (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs averages 2.2 TCR (70% of the Code Enforcement BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=2 · BLS 3.2

Where 6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs falls in its industry

131 Code Enforcement establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Code Enforcement employers in North Carolina.

6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs (459 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs
6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs (459 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

6935-Luesa-Land Use and Environ Srvs has more employees than the Code Enforcement median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.0 1.6 9 0 0
2021 1.8 1.1 8 0 0
2020 3.7 3.2 17 0 0
2019 1.8 1.1 8 0 0
2018 2.5 1.6 10 1 0
2017 1.6 1.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · NC · Charlotte

131 Code Enforcement employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Padilla Bay 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WPCA 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division of Integrated Regional Water Management 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE American Emergency Vehicle 459 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monroe 459 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DLT3 459 FTE
STATE-SIZE Universal Leaf North America/Nash 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR 234140-Hanover Po 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0123 JBS USA - Omaha 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Spartech - Newark, NJ 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Leviton Network Solutions - Bloomingdale 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Franklin Medical Group, PC 459 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intermountain Distribution Center - 57 459 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huhtamaki Batavia 459 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4813-48130007-Freeman Av Dallas 459 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.