Industry profile · NAICS 924110

Water control and quality program administration

Workplace injury rates across 150 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

150
Employers
5.3
Avg TCR
3.2
BLS benchmark
4,821
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Water control and quality program administration average 5.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.6 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.2.

5.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.2
BLS national benchmark
150
employers reporting
4,821
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Water control and quality program administration Safety Data Reveals

The Water control and quality program administration sector (NAICS 924110) encompasses 150 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,821 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Water control and quality program administration that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Pwd Sanitation Bristol, CT F 27.0
City of Genoa - Public Works Department Genoa, IL F 26.9
WCC Lacey, WA F 25.5
Bristol Water Department Bristol, CT F 24.3
Pwd Wpc Bristol, CT F 21.0
Water Department Bristol, CT F 18.9
Water WPC Bristol, CT F 18.2
Penas Disposal Cutler, CA F 17.0
Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste Roseburg, OR F 16.3
Waste Management (CON-012) Norfolk, VA F 16.1
City Of Sacramento-Solid Waste Division Roll-Up (150058) Sacramento, CA F 14.4
Public Works Agency Evanston, IL F 13.3
Siskiyou County Air Pollution - Ag Yreka, CA F 13.1
Iredell County Solid Waste Facility Statesville, NC F 12.5
Utilities and Environemtal Services Hayward, CA F 12.3
Public Works Lake Oswego, OR F 12.3
Rec. Plant 1365 W. 2300 No. Salt Lake City, UT F 12.1
Public Works Modesto, CA F 11.8
Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority Albuquerque, NM F 11.8
City of Greensboro Field Operations Department Greensboro, NC F 11.8
00000010 Public Works Department Santa Cruz, CA F 11.7
0049-00000010 Santa Cruz, CA F 11.7
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Govt - Public Works - SWMS - Admin Louisville, KY F 11.3
Water Department Asheville, NC F 10.5
City of Phoenix F70 Public Wks Phoenix, AZ F 9.8
Water Department Shelby Township, MI F 9.0
Public Works- Sanitation/Streets/W & S Washington, NC F 8.9
City Of Meriden Water Department Meriden, CT F 8.5
Public Works - Operations Salem, OR F 8.4
Public Works Department Norfolk, VA F 8.3
Maintenance Center Lake Oswego, OR F 8.1
City of Phoenix G80 Water Serv Phoenix, AZ F 8.1
Ventura Water Ventura, CA F 7.6
O&M - San Luis Field Division Gustine, CA F 7.3
O&M - San Joaquin Field Division Bakersfield, CA F 7.1
Sanitary District of Decatur Decatur, IL F 7.1
Orange County - Solid Waste Management Chapel Hill, NC F 7.0
O&M - Southern Field Division Pearblossom, CA F 6.9
City Of Sacramento-Solid Waste Division Roll-Up (150057) Sacramento, CA F 6.8
Environmental Service Department Tucson, AZ F 6.7
Environmental Servcies Tucson, AZ F 6.7
Linden Linden, NJ D 6.4
Walnut Valley Water District Walnut, CA D 6.3
IRWM - Northern Region Office Red Bluff, CA D 5.9
Water Regan 1530 S West Temple Salt Lake City, UT D 5.8
Water/Sewer 1530 S. Jefferson Salt Lake City, UT D 5.8
O&M - Oroville Field Division Oroville, CA D 5.6
LASAN - Solid Resources Support Services Division - Administration Management City of Los Angeles, CA D 5.2
Water Admin/ Water Regan 1530 S West Temple Salt Lake City, UT D 5.2
Bureau of Outdoor Recreation Hartford, CT D 5.0
Page 1 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Water control and quality program administration?

This sector averages 5.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.