Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Texas

7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage

Dallas, TX · ~64 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage: 1.2 TCR = 42% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage safety composite

7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2017→2018

7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage injury rate improved

7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.4 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #139/327
  • PHOTO Miller Construction …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Miller Construction Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage averages 1.2 TCR (42% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.9

Where 7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #139 safest of 327 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Texas.

7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage (64 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate 7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage
7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage (64 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

7015116 - Love Field Parking Garage has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.4 1.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TX · Dallas

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Miller Construction Company 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Erickson-Hall Construction Co. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kirkley Corporation, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR White Contrsuction Group 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Midland 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE GRANTX-INC-GRANBURY,TX - TEXAS 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pool Tec (North) 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Custom Care Hospice 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Bilfinger Industrial Services 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR EOS Fitness - Tempe 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Thor Industries 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR FiberVisions Manufacturing Company 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE NC089 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE S09363 - Deffenbaugh KC MRF 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE MMM Model Shop 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Akron Distribution Center (Akron DC) Location 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.