General Warehousing and Storage · California

86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C

Patterson, CA · ~616 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade D.

86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C: 7.4 TCR = 127% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C safety composite

86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C: 5.5 → 9.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2024

86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C's TCR rose 3.7 from 5.5 in 2023 to 9.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Patterson, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.4 · 127% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #858/1131
  • PHOTO Building 26
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~616 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Building 26 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C averages 7.4 TCR (127% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C TCR series: 2023=5.5 · 2024=9.2 · BLS 5.8

Where 86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #858 safest of 1131 General Warehousing and Storag employers in California.

86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C (616 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C
86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C (616 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

86200b01 Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.2 8.3 37 2 0
2023 5.5 4.2 24 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Patterson

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 36 employers in Patterson, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Building 26 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pendleton 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 01009200-00W028 BRADFORD AIRPORT LOGISTICS, LTD-BRADFORD AIRPORT LOGISTICS, LTD 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lifescience Logistics - BDL 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Medtronic Santa Rosa 616 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6458-ZARC 616 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - OAK3 616 FTE
STATE-SIZE T.T.Miyasaka Inc. 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salinas FLC 963 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : OAK3 899 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 324 699 FTE
CITY-NEAR J.Rodriguez FLC Inc 679 FTE
NAT-TCR Nutrivo, LLC 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR O'Brien Orchards, Inc. 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin County Government 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Anoka ACT 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE BVMP 616 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurubis Buffalo, Inc. 616 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX_El Paso_1359 Lomaland Drive_54835001 616 FTE
NAT-SIZE Customer Contact Center 616 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.