Tread rubber (i.e., camelback) manufacturing · North Carolina

8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc

Mocksville, NC · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tread rubber (i.e., camelback) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc: 4.4 TCR = 133% of Tread rubber (i.e., camelback) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc safety composite

8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc: 3.9 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 9.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.69× in 2019

8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc's TCR rose 5.4 from 3.9 in 2016 to 9.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326211 · Mocksville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 133% of ind

  • DART 7.4 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO Goodyear Topeka
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodyear Topeka (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc averages 4.4 TCR (133% of the Tread rubber (i.e., camelback) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=9.3 · BLS 3.3

Where 8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc falls in its industry

114 Tread rubber (i.e., camelback) establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Tread rubber (i.e., camelback) employers in North Carolina.

8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc (42 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 393 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc
8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc (42 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 393 employees and a TCR of 3.2

8A9 Dunlop Aircraft Tyres, INc has fewer employees than the Tread rubber (i.e., camelback) manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 9.3 7.4 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.9 3.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326211 · NC · Mocksville

114 Tread rubber (i.e., camelback) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 44 employers in Mocksville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodyear Topeka 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Titan Tire Corporation 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toyo Tire North America Manufacturing Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Findlay Cooper Tire & Rubber Plant 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Vernon Hatchery 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPI USA NC LLC - Southport 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBEMARLE-WMSTN 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Operations Center 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75) 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Mocksville, NC-USA 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kontoor Brands Inc. Distribution Center Mocksville NC 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR VF Jeanswear Mocksville 380 FTE
NAT-TCR Bettendorf Branch 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Plasma Biological Services - Columbia, MO 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Aic Stl 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Seohan USA Corporation 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gravel Shooters & Quality Waterproofing, LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kit Carson 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moser's Foods #8 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Machining & Fabricating, Inc. 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.