Yarn spinning mills · North Carolina

Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75)

Mocksville, NC · ~472 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75) runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Yarn spinning mills workplace, earning a grade C.

Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75): 3.3 TCR = 101% of Yarn spinning mills BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75) safety composite

Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2018→2024

Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75) injury rate improved

Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75)'s TCR fell 4.0 from 5.5 in 2018 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.5 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 313110 · Mocksville, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 101% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #47/74
  • PHOTO Coats North America …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 98 inj
  • SIZE ~472 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coats North America - Albany Mill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75) averages 3.3 TCR (101% of the Yarn spinning mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75) TCR series: 2018=5.5 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75) falls in its industry

195 Yarn spinning mills establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 74 Yarn spinning mills employers in North Carolina.

Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75) (472 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75)
Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75) (472 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Gildan Yarns, LLC (Plant # 75) has more employees than the Yarn spinning mills median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.0 9 0 0
2023 2.4 1.6 10 4 0
2022 2.4 0.8 8 4 0
2021 1.8 1.2 6 0 0
2020 5.5 4.9 19 0 0
2019 4.2 3.0 20 1 0
2018 5.5 5.0 26 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

313110 · NC · Mocksville

195 Yarn spinning mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 44 employers in Mocksville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coats North America - Albany Mill 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frontier Spinning Mills Plant 2 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frontier Spinning Mills Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ED 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE US FOODS CHARLOTTE, NC 472 FTE
STATE-SIZE Department of Social Services - Greensboro 472 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wayne Brothers Inc. 473 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robert Bosch Tool Corporation 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Mocksville, NC-USA 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kontoor Brands Inc. Distribution Center Mocksville NC 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR VF Jeanswear Mocksville 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ingersoll Rand 348 FTE
NAT-TCR Jamestown Container Corporation 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Foodservice Florence - 0820 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Foodservice Houston - 1031 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-13398 International Parkway 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Argon Medical Devices Inc. 472 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanderson Farms Foods Division 472 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmond 472 FTE
NAT-SIZE TXMSN 472 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.