Regulation and Administration of Transportation Programs · Maryland

9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police

Baltimore, MD · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Regulation and Administration of Transportation Programs workplace, earning a grade C.

9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police: 3.6 TCR = 113% of Regulation and Administration of Transportation Programs BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police safety composite

9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2022→2023

9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police injury rate improved

9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police's TCR fell 2.7 from 5.0 in 2022 to 2.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.0 · 2023=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 926120 · Baltimore, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 113% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #7/12
  • PHOTO District 5
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: District 5 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police averages 3.6 TCR (113% of the Regulation and Administration of Transportation Programs BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police TCR series: 2022=5 · 2023=2.2 · BLS 3.2

Where 9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police falls in its industry

208 Regulation and Administration establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 12 Regulation and Administration employers in Maryland.

9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police (40 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police
9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police (40 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 3.6

9181 - MDTA Baltimore Port - Police has fewer employees than the Regulation and Administration of Transpo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 5.0 5.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

926120 · MD · Baltimore

208 Regulation and Administration of Transportation Programs employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR District 5 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Iowa DOT - Cedar Rapids Garage 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities (70) 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Central Region WSOT 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chalk Point Generating Station 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Revolution Solar 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFM/Severn Associates JV 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain, LLC 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR King Luminaire 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AZZ Galvanizing - Hurst 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MAS Construction Services, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bay Area 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Henderson Terminal 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Image City Interiors, LLC. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Bioresources, Inc 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Isometric Micro Molding, Inc. 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.