Allergists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · North Carolina

Aaa-Allergy and Asthma

Greensboro, NC · ~40 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aaa-Allergy and Asthma runs at 214% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Allergists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade F.

Aaa-Allergy and Asthma: 8.1 TCR = 214% of Allergists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aaa-Allergy and Asthma safety composite

Aaa-Allergy and Asthma scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aaa-Allergy and Asthma: 3.9 → 16.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 16.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2024

Aaa-Allergy and Asthma's TCR rose 12.5 from 3.9 in 2017 to 16.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 214% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #137/152
  • PHOTO EPPA Mercy Hospital
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EPPA Mercy Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Aaa-Allergy and Asthma in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aaa-Allergy and Asthma averages 8.1 TCR (214% of the Allergists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aaa-Allergy and Asthma TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2018=3.5 · 2022=10.5 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=16.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Aaa-Allergy and Asthma falls in its industry

2,836 Allergists' offices (e.g., cen establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #137 safest of 152 Allergists' offices (e.g., cen employers in North Carolina.

Aaa-Allergy and Asthma (40 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Aaa-Allergy and Asthma
Aaa-Allergy and Asthma (40 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Aaa-Allergy and Asthma has fewer employees than the Allergists' offices (e.g., centers, clin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.4 5.5 6 0 0
2023 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2022 10.5 10.5 3 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2017 3.9 3.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · NC · Greensboro

2,836 Allergists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EPPA Mercy Hospital 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR LEXINGTON CLINIC ORTHOPEDICS SPORTS MEDICINE CENTER 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporacion de Servicios Medicos Primarios y Prevencion de Arecibo 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Bay Medical Foundation (30492) 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gary Thomas Farms 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Turf of NC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fords Produce Company Inc 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pender Nursery Inc. 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Chatsworth Products Co, CA 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakmont of Silver Creek 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Minnesota DC7 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 707 N Broadway 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Onaga Health and Rehab 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia Cottage-Hershey 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nouryon Surface Chemistry LLC - Fort Worth 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rescue Squad 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.