Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Abbotswood at Stonehenge

Raleigh, NC · ~79 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Abbotswood at Stonehenge runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Abbotswood at Stonehenge: 1.9 TCR = 49% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Abbotswood at Stonehenge safety composite

Abbotswood at Stonehenge scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

Abbotswood at Stonehenge injury rate improved

Abbotswood at Stonehenge's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.1 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Raleigh, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/356
  • PHOTO CONNECTIONS LIFE CARE
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CONNECTIONS LIFE CARE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Abbotswood at Stonehenge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Abbotswood at Stonehenge averages 1.9 TCR (49% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Abbotswood at Stonehenge TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Abbotswood at Stonehenge falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Abbotswood at Stonehenge (79 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Abbotswood at Stonehenge
Abbotswood at Stonehenge (79 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Abbotswood at Stonehenge has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 5.8 2.9 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Raleigh

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CONNECTIONS LIFE CARE 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Grand Blanc Assisted Living 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Court Senior Care 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5045 - The Clairmont 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience Laurinburg 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE GASTONIA OPS MOC GARAGE BLDG B 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sikes Place - Ste 100 / 200 / 250 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inside Sales Raleigh 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR 2563 Web41 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Grand Blanc Assisted Living 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Florence Detention Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 2022 Coborn's Sauk Centre 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Etna Supply - Wixom 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE ADI Construction of Virginia LLC 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZZ Galvanizing - Chattanooga LLC 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paramount Printing 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.