Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Massachusetts

Abbott Action Canton

Canton, MA · ~29 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Abbott Action Canton runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Abbott Action Canton: 2.3 TCR = 70% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Abbott Action Canton safety composite

Abbott Action Canton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Abbott Action Canton: 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.24× in 2022

Abbott Action Canton's TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Canton, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 70% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #8/21
  • PHOTO Chicago GPP
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chicago GPP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Abbott Action Canton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Abbott Action Canton averages 2.3 TCR (70% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Abbott Action Canton TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Abbott Action Canton falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 21 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Massachusetts.

Abbott Action Canton (29 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Abbott Action Canton
Abbott Action Canton (29 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Abbott Action Canton has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2021 5.7 5.7 2 0 0
2020 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · MA · Canton

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 98 employers in Canton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chicago GPP 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Crawfordsville 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Abbott Action Norwood 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Skyline Solar 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Building Co. Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CTA Construction Co., Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Construction Corp. 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Canton 4,420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Locations) 855 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Location's) 631 FTE
CITY-NEAR E.M. Duggan, Inc. 432 FTE
NAT-TCR Stress Engineering Services Inc., Waller, Texas 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Crescent Plastics, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisher School District ISD 600 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Rehabilitation Center of Lake City 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bratton Masonry - WA/OR 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Fort Myers The Colony 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colonial Engineering Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stason Pharmaceuticals 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.