Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · Indiana

Crescent Plastics, Inc.

Evansville, IN · ~65 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crescent Plastics, Inc. runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Crescent Plastics, Inc.: 2.3 TCR = 70% of Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crescent Plastics, Inc. safety composite

Crescent Plastics, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crescent Plastics, Inc.: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2022

Crescent Plastics, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Evansville, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 70% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #3/10
  • PHOTO Mitsubishi Chemical …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials- Wytheville Manufacturing Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Crescent Plastics, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crescent Plastics, Inc. averages 2.3 TCR (70% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crescent Plastics, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=3 · 2022=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Crescent Plastics, Inc. falls in its industry

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 10 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in Indiana.

Crescent Plastics, Inc. (65 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Crescent Plastics, Inc.
Crescent Plastics, Inc. (65 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Crescent Plastics, Inc. has fewer employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrig median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2018 4.6 1.5 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · IN · Evansville

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 489 employers in Evansville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mitsubishi Chemical Advanced Materials- Wytheville Manufacturing Facility 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Petro Packaging Company, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atkore HDPE Lovelady 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Putnam Plastics Corporation 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE FTWN NE Svc Ctr 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Runnebohm Construction Company Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELECOM PLACEMENT INC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE COMBDRIN-IndyEast 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deaconess Midtown 3,068 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global - Evansville, IN (Oakley Str.) 2,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global 2,017 FTE
CITY-NEAR NBC Merchants, LLC 1,859 FTE
NAT-TCR Fisher School District ISD 600 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Stress Engineering Services Inc., Waller, Texas 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Abbott Action Canton 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Rehabilitation Center of Lake City 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Converting Division Texas), LLC 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE J. M. Fahey Construction Company 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homer City Location - Homer City 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poway RHF Housing Inc. 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.