Skilled nursing facilities · Massachusetts

Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center

Lynn, MA · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center runs at 254% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center: 16.5 TCR = 254% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center safety composite

Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−35.1

2022→2024

Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center injury rate improved

Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center's TCR fell 35.1 from 42.3 in 2022 to 7.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 42.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=42.3 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=7.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Lynn, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.5 · 254% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #377/423
  • PHOTO Peak Resources-Shelby
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peak Resources-Shelby (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center averages 16.5 TCR (254% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center TCR series: 2022=42.3 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=7.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #377 safest of 423 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Massachusetts.

Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center (66 employees, TCR 16.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center
Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center (66 employees, TCR 16.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.2 7.2 3 0 0
2023 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 42.3 42.3 0 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MA · Lynn

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 54 employers in Lynn, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peak Resources-Shelby 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BURLINGTON WOODS CENTER 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Porter Hills 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosewood Manor 16.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE A&M Roofing Services, LLC 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE New England electrical contracting corp 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE BT Auburndale 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office-Main 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Lynn, MA 2,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Lynn MA 2,628 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kettle Cuisine 451 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greater Lynn Senior Services, Inc 437 FTE
NAT-TCR Masonicare at Mystic 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilded Mirrors Inc. 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ilper - Peru 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR White Rabbit Logistics 16.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Island Wide Logistics LLC 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Trailer Manufacturing LLC 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tools of Marketing, Inc 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trax Logistics Inc. 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.