Mirrors, framed (except automotive) or unframed, made from purchased glass · Tennessee

Gilded Mirrors Inc.

Maryville, TN · ~28 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gilded Mirrors Inc. runs at 501% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mirrors, framed (except automotive) or unframed, made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade F.

Gilded Mirrors Inc.: 16.5 TCR = 501% of Mirrors, framed (except automotive) or unframed, made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gilded Mirrors Inc. safety composite

Gilded Mirrors Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.9

2017→2024

Gilded Mirrors Inc. injury rate improved

Gilded Mirrors Inc.'s TCR fell 7.9 from 19.4 in 2017 to 11.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 38.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=19.4 · 2018=8.0 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=38.2 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=22.9 · 2023=16.4 · 2024=11.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Maryville, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.5 · 501% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #20/20
  • PHOTO Glass Fabricator
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Glass Fabricator (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Gilded Mirrors Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gilded Mirrors Inc. averages 16.5 TCR (501% of the Mirrors, framed (except automotive) or unframed, made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gilded Mirrors Inc. TCR series: 2017=19.4 · 2018=8 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=38.2 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=22.9 · 2023=16.4 · 2024=11.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Gilded Mirrors Inc. falls in its industry

441 Mirrors, framed (except automo establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 20 Mirrors, framed (except automo employers in Tennessee.

Gilded Mirrors Inc. (28 employees, TCR 16.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Gilded Mirrors Inc.
Gilded Mirrors Inc. (28 employees, TCR 16.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Gilded Mirrors Inc. has fewer employees than the Mirrors, framed (except automotive) or u median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.4 5.7 2 0 0
2023 16.4 3.3 5 0 0
2022 22.9 9.8 7 0 0
2021 8.3 0.0 2 0 0
2020 38.2 0.0 9 0 0
2019 7.6 3.8 2 0 0
2018 8.0 4.0 2 0 0
2017 19.4 11.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · TN · Maryville

441 Mirrors, framed (except automotive) or unframed, made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 79 employers in Maryville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Glass Fabricator 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DWK Rochester 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AAG Glass LLC 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Glass 15.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE K&K Tobacco Farms LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tosh Pork Martin 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE UCEMC Livingston 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lashlee-Rich, Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR DENSO Manufacturing Tennessee, Inc. 4,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR Denso Manufacturing Tennessee, Inc.- DMTN 4,498 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blount Memorial Hospital 2,046 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clayton Homes 1,919 FTE
NAT-TCR White Rabbit Logistics 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Masonicare at Mystic 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Abbott Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ilper - Peru 16.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rome Enterprises II Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Armature Works Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Welding & Fabrication Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rio Nutrition 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.