Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Virginia

Abingdon Physician Partners

Abingdon, VA · ~93 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Abingdon Physician Partners runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade C.

Abingdon Physician Partners: 3.2 TCR = 84% of Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Abingdon Physician Partners safety composite

Abingdon Physician Partners scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Abingdon Physician Partners: 0.0 → 6.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 6.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2022

Abingdon Physician Partners's TCR rose 6.9 from 0.0 in 2017 to 6.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Abingdon, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 84% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #52/75
  • PHOTO Wahpeton Clinic
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wahpeton Clinic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Abingdon Physician Partners in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Abingdon Physician Partners averages 3.2 TCR (84% of the Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Abingdon Physician Partners TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.5 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=6.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Abingdon Physician Partners falls in its industry

2,836 Family physicians' offices (e. establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 75 Family physicians' offices (e. employers in Virginia.

Abingdon Physician Partners (93 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Abingdon Physician Partners
Abingdon Physician Partners (93 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Abingdon Physician Partners has more employees than the Family physicians' offices (e.g., center median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.9 1.4 5 0 0
2021 5.5 0.0 4 0 0
2019 3.5 0.0 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · VA · Abingdon

2,836 Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 46 employers in Abingdon, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wahpeton Clinic 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loyola Ctr for Health-Elmhurst 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-30343) 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Medical Foundation (185-235) 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Chesapeake - Maintenance and Operations 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4103 - Roanoke, VA 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE JES Virginia Beach 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Ridge 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Food City Distribution Center 845 FTE
CITY-NEAR JOHNSTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 658 FTE
CITY-NEAR Food City Support Center 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 154 335 FTE
NAT-TCR Pierce Pepin Cooperative Services 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR GKN Aerospace Engine Systems, Manchester 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Illingworth-Kilgust Mechanical Madison Office 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Paff Landscape Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pruitt Health Orangeburg 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fisher School District ISD 600 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheridan Medical Lodge 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graham HealthCare & Rehabilittion Center 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.