Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Ohio
Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center
Lewis Center, OH · ~180 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.3
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade A.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.3
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 3
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center's OSHA Total Case Rate of 1.3 to the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark of 3.3 (38% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center falls in its industry
643 Electroplating metals and form establishmentsSafer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.
Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 68 Electroplating metals and form employers in Ohio.
Trend analysis for Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center
Between 2023 and 2024, Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center's Total Case Rate improved from 1.3 to 1.2 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 8% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2024, at a TCR of 1.2, while 2023 saw the highest rate, at 1.3, a spread of 0.1 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center recorded 3 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 3 injuries, 1 illnesses shown on this page for Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 332813 - Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
2 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 332,597 hours worked = 1.20 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center (this establishment) | 1.25 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 332813 |
| Ohio state avg (all industries) | 3.90 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 2 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 38% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade benchmark, Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center's safety grade?
How many injuries has Abrasive Technology - Lewis Center reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Ohio, and by nearby establishments in Lewis Center - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~1.3)
Similar size (~180 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.