Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground · Texas

Acadian - North Central Texas District

Austin, TX · ~168 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Acadian - North Central Texas District runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground workplace, earning a grade D.

Acadian - North Central Texas District: 6.2 TCR = 163% of Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Acadian - North Central Texas District safety composite

Acadian - North Central Texas District scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Acadian - North Central Texas District: 6.0 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.93× in 2024

Acadian - North Central Texas District's TCR rose 0.4 from 6.0 in 2023 to 6.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621910 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 163% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #34/63
  • PHOTO Life EMS Inc.-Allegan
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Life EMS Inc.-Allegan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Acadian - North Central Texas District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Acadian - North Central Texas District averages 6.2 TCR (163% of the Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Acadian - North Central Texas District TCR series: 2023=6 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Acadian - North Central Texas District falls in its industry

976 Emergency medical transportati establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 63 Emergency medical transportati employers in Texas.

Acadian - North Central Texas District (168 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Acadian - North Central Texas District
Acadian - North Central Texas District (168 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3

Acadian - North Central Texas District has more employees than the Emergency medical transportation service median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 5.8 10 0 0
2023 6.0 4.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621910 · TX · Austin

976 Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Life EMS Inc.-Allegan 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life EMS Inc.-Ottawa 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Starnet Emergency Services -DBA- Westchester EMS 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trans Am Ambulance Service 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harrington/Nichols Station 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE EDP 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Morrison - Houston Division 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capstone Mechanical 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Shannon Fabrics, Inc 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Richfield District Office 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ufp Folkston LLC 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Njsbr - Cranbury 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brockport 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakewood Camping Resort 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Four Points by Sheraton Los Angeles International Airport 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ene Systems, Inc. 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.