Automatic merchandising machine operators · Texas

Accent Food Services San Antonio

San Antonio, TX · ~27 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.7
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Accent Food Services San Antonio runs at 373% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Automatic merchandising machine operators workplace, earning a grade F.

Accent Food Services San Antonio: 12.7 TCR = 373% of Automatic merchandising machine operators BLS 3.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Accent Food Services San Antonio safety composite

Accent Food Services San Antonio scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
D 6.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.7

2018→2021

Accent Food Services San Antonio injury rate improved

Accent Food Services San Antonio's TCR fell 8.7 from 15.0 in 2018 to 6.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 18.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=15.0 · 2019=18.9 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 454210 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.7 · 373% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #21/26
  • PHOTO Madison Vending
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Madison Vending (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Accent Food Services San Antonio in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Accent Food Services San Antonio averages 12.7 TCR (373% of the Automatic merchandising machine operators BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Accent Food Services San Antonio TCR series: 2018=15 · 2019=18.9 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=6.3 · BLS 3.4

Where Accent Food Services San Antonio falls in its industry

311 Automatic merchandising machin establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 26 Automatic merchandising machin employers in Texas.

Accent Food Services San Antonio (27 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 7.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Accent Food Services San Antonio
Accent Food Services San Antonio (27 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 7.1

Accent Food Services San Antonio has fewer employees than the Automatic merchandising machine operator median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.3 6.3 1 0 0
2020 10.4 10.4 2 0 0
2019 18.9 18.9 6 0 0
2018 15.0 9.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

454210 · TX · San Antonio

311 Automatic merchandising machine operators employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Madison Vending 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix C R S 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington Vending 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Denver C R S 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE TLM - Tree Farm 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heifer Ranch @ Arroyo Seco 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dean Cluck Feedyard, Inc. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE CanTex Feeders LP 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Lazy Acres Encinitas 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Swanson Bark & Wood Products, Inc 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Stief Concrte Work Inc. 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Villas at St James 12.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Drinking Water Treatment 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Artois Ranch 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lancaster 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gilco Trucking 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.