Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · Pennsylvania

Stief Concrte Work Inc.

New Holland, PA · ~49 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stief Concrte Work Inc. runs at 453% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Stief Concrte Work Inc.: 12.7 TCR = 453% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stief Concrte Work Inc. safety composite

Stief Concrte Work Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Stief Concrte Work Inc.: 8.3 → 20.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 22.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.62× in 2021

Stief Concrte Work Inc.'s TCR rose 12.2 from 8.3 in 2016 to 20.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 22.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · New Holland, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.7 · 453% of ind

  • DART 20.6 DART
  • RANK #60/66
  • PHOTO Bull Concrete LV Off…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bull Concrete LV Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Stief Concrte Work Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stief Concrte Work Inc. averages 12.7 TCR (453% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stief Concrte Work Inc. TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=11.6 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=22.5 · 2021=20.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Stief Concrte Work Inc. falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 66 Foundation, building, poured c employers in Pennsylvania.

Stief Concrte Work Inc. (49 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Stief Concrte Work Inc.
Stief Concrte Work Inc. (49 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Stief Concrte Work Inc. has fewer employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 20.6 20.6 8 0 0
2020 22.5 20.0 8 1 0
2019 8.7 8.7 4 0 0
2018 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2017 11.6 7.8 6 0 0
2016 8.3 8.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · PA · New Holland

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 67 employers in New Holland, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bull Concrete LV Office 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Drew Brandt Construction, Inc. 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CRUX Concrete Construction Inc 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Office 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bonnie Brae Fruit Farms, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & L Orchard Co. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vallorani Mushrooms 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Story of PA- Smithfield (AWH) 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Holland Plant 558 FTE
CITY-NEAR CNH Industrial - New Holland 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR CNH Industrial - New Holland Engineering 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR Garden Spot Village 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Accent Food Services San Antonio 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lazy Acres Encinitas 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Swanson Bark & Wood Products, Inc 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ziggy's, Post Falls, ID 12.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE T C Construction Inc 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bristol, Elmcroft of 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson, Elmcroft of 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Specialties, Inc. 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.