Distribution of electric power · New Jersey

ACE- Bridgeton Operations

Bridgeton, NJ · ~56 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ACE- Bridgeton Operations runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade D.

ACE- Bridgeton Operations: 2.1 TCR = 175% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ACE- Bridgeton Operations safety composite

ACE- Bridgeton Operations scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ACE- Bridgeton Operations: 0.0 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

ACE- Bridgeton Operations's TCR rose 3.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Bridgeton, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.1 · 175% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO Metropolitan Edison …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Metropolitan Edison Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

ACE- Bridgeton Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ACE- Bridgeton Operations averages 2.1 TCR (175% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ACE- Bridgeton Operations TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 1.2

Where ACE- Bridgeton Operations falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Distribution of electric power employers in New Jersey.

ACE- Bridgeton Operations (56 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ACE- Bridgeton Operations
ACE- Bridgeton Operations (56 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

ACE- Bridgeton Operations has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.4 5.5 4 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.7 0.8 2 0 0
2017 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NJ · Bridgeton

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 30 employers in Bridgeton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Metropolitan Edison Company 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bismarck Service Center 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LUMA, Carolina Hangar 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brewerton-NYEB 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cogen Technologies Linden Venture LP 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACE-Cape May Courthouse Operations 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Township Department of Water Pollution Control (Sewer) 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prismatic Development Corporation 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hopewell Nursery - Bridgeton 564 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ardagh Glass Inc Bridgeton 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR South State, Inc. 296 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5384 229 FTE
NAT-TCR Plover Facility 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 3M 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Equipment Division - North 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pharmacy-Lite Prescription Packaging - Ohio Plant 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valley Coop Oil Mill 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modern Ag Products 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 500 Osage 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twilight Acres 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.