Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated · Maryland

Plant 3M

Hanover, MD · ~44 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plant 3M runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated workplace, earning a grade A.

Plant 3M: 2.1 TCR = 36% of Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plant 3M safety composite

Plant 3M scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Plant 3M held a steady TCR band

Plant 3M's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.0 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · Hanover, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 36% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Dallas Service Center
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dallas Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Plant 3M in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plant 3M averages 2.1 TCR (36% of the Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plant 3M TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 5.8

Where Plant 3M falls in its industry

453 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Private warehousing and storag employers in Maryland.

Plant 3M (44 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Plant 3M
Plant 3M (44 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Plant 3M has fewer employees than the Private warehousing and storage except f median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 2.1 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.8 3.5 5 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.0 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · MD · Hanover

453 Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 121 employers in Hanover, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dallas Service Center 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mira Loma B26 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TransMontaigne Martinez Facility 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baltimore - Sunoco LLC 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE MS - Annapolis Junction, MD - 1ANMD 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.A. Drenner Concrete, Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Crown Electric Co. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belair Engineering 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR PPE Casino Resorts Maryland d/b/a Live! Casino & Hotel 2,371 FTE
CITY-NEAR Keller North America Inc. 2,303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ciena - Remote workers 1,746 FTE
CITY-NEAR PEAPOD HANOVER WAREHOUSE 1,556 FTE
NAT-TCR ACE- Bridgeton Operations 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Plover Facility 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Equipment Division - North 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pharmacy-Lite Prescription Packaging - Ohio Plant 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Montfort Bros Inc 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ebben Masonry Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fwa Chpp 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stoever-Parker Electric, Inc. 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.