Sewer cleaning and rodding services · Texas

Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas)

Fort Worth, TX · ~71 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas) runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sewer cleaning and rodding services workplace, earning a grade B.

Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas): 2.0 TCR = 75% of Sewer cleaning and rodding services BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas) safety composite

Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas): 0.0 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.98× in 2024

Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas)'s TCR rose 4.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562998 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 75% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO Continuum Environemt…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Continuum Environemtnal Services Ltd. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas) averages 2.0 TCR (75% of the Sewer cleaning and rodding services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 2.6

Where Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas) falls in its industry

121 Sewer cleaning and rodding ser establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Sewer cleaning and rodding ser employers in Texas.

Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas) (71 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas)
Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas) (71 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Texas) has more employees than the Sewer cleaning and rodding services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 1.9 5 0 0
2023 3.4 2.3 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2019 2.9 1.4 2 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562998 · TX · Fort Worth

121 Sewer cleaning and rodding services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Continuum Environemtnal Services Ltd. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR C&K Canton 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pipeline Video Inspection, LLC dba AIMS Companies (DFW) 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HSI & ES, LLC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE West Gaines Seed Inc 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Innovex Downhole Solutions Andrews 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE SYSTEM OPERATIONS 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edinburg Location 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Family & Community Services, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Boro Developers, Inc. d/b/a Boro Construction 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Plastipak- Ottumwa 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Elgin Recycling Electronics Warehouse 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shelly Electric 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE McInnis Construction, LLC 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Luke's Internal Medicine 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skyline Roofing Inc. 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.