Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Oklahoma

Acme Manufacturing

Claremore, OK · ~26 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Acme Manufacturing runs at 694% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Acme Manufacturing: 22.9 TCR = 694% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Acme Manufacturing safety composite

Acme Manufacturing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Acme Manufacturing: 3.5 → 22.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 36.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Acme Manufacturing's TCR rose 19.0 from 3.5 in 2017 to 22.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 36.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Claremore, OK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.9 · 694% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/11
  • PHOTO Gray Metal South, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gray Metal South, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Acme Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Acme Manufacturing averages 22.9 TCR (694% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Acme Manufacturing TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=24 · 2019=23.5 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=32.6 · 2022=36.1 · 2023=30.5 · 2024=22.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Acme Manufacturing falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 11 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Oklahoma.

Acme Manufacturing (26 employees, TCR 22.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Acme Manufacturing
Acme Manufacturing (26 employees, TCR 22.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Acme Manufacturing has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 22.5 0.0 4 0 0
2023 30.5 0.0 6 0 0
2022 36.1 10.3 7 0 0
2021 32.6 12.2 8 0 0
2020 10.4 5.2 2 0 0
2019 23.5 9.4 5 0 0
2018 24.0 13.7 7 0 0
2017 3.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · OK · Claremore

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 54 employers in Claremore, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gray Metal South, Inc. 23.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters 23.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heavy Duty Ramps 22.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northeast Industrial 23.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farmers Coop Association- Eldorado 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cactus Drilling Rig 135 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cactus Drilling Rig 140 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cactus Drilling Rig 141 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR AXH Air-Coolers 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baker Hughes - Claremore Pump Plant 534 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baker Hughes Pump Plant 509 FTE
CITY-NEAR Claremore Indian Hospital 472 FTE
NAT-TCR Food Processing 22.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HG837 22.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0053 Glendale 22.9 TCR
NAT-TCR City Of Meriden Fire Department Engine # 2 22.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wilson Case, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clearwood Custom Carpentry & Millwork, LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mid-State Filigree Systems 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE J. Dean Ballard & Sons Tile & Marble Co. 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.