Casings, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing · Washington

Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters

Fife, WA · ~41 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters runs at 700% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Casings, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters: 23.1 TCR = 700% of Casings, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters safety composite

Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2018

Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters injury rate improved

Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters's TCR fell 4.5 from 25.4 in 2016 to 20.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 25.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=25.4 · 2018=20.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Fife, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 23.1 · 700% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #23/23
  • PHOTO Gray Metal South, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gray Metal South, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters averages 23.1 TCR (700% of the Casings, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters TCR series: 2016=25.4 · 2018=20.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters falls in its industry

1,158 Casings, sheet metal (except s establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 23 Casings, sheet metal (except s employers in Washington.

Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters (41 employees, TCR 23.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters
Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters (41 employees, TCR 23.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Seattle CDI Custom Curb Adapters has fewer employees than the Casings, sheet metal (except stampings), median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 20.8 4.2 9 1 0
2016 25.4 7.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · WA · Fife

1,158 Casings, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 90 employers in Fife, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gray Metal South, Inc. 23.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acme Manufacturing 22.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northeast Industrial 23.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heavy Duty Ramps 22.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waterworks, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cascade Natural Gas Bellingham District Office-Operations-Field 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Soos Creek Water & Sewer District 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE NSK20 - North Sky - Tacoma 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Puyallup Tribe of Indians Emerald Queen Hotel & Casinos 2,236 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RNT9 816 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1323 34th Ave E 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milgard Windows & Doors -- Tacoma Manufacturing 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Fire Services 23.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Greek Peak Mountain Resort 23.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bickford of Chesterfield 23.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 8032 23.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE VIC-HCT-VICTORIA 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE D.C. Cpc 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 22 - Theisen's - Sparta 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE J. F. Shea Construction, PA 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.