Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Indiana

ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN

Indianapolis, IN · ~614 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN: 1.5 TCR = 33% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN safety composite

ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN: 1.2 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2018

ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN's TCR rose 0.6 from 1.2 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 33% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO 9123-MDW-PRIME APPEA…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~614 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 9123-MDW-PRIME APPEARANCE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN averages 1.5 TCR (33% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.8 · BLS 4.5

Where ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Indiana.

ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN (614 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN
ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN (614 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN has more employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.8 1.3 14 0 0
2017 1.4 0.9 12 0 0
2016 1.2 0.8 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · IN · Indianapolis

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 9123-MDW-PRIME APPEARANCE 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TPA-FFM 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 191 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Flying Service LLC 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beck's Atlanta 614 FTE
STATE-SIZE FRANKFORT EAST 614 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tropicana Evansville 614 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bemis Co. 611 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR JLM Advanced Tech. Service 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AC Home Depot US 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 03 - Dewitt 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 43141h - Normal Il Pec 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Salt Lake City Global Business Services (Utcst) 614 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dml2 614 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lipan Distribution Center 614 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Toledo Physicians, LLC 614 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.