Paper making machinery repair and maintenance services · Wisconsin

JLM Advanced Tech. Service

Appleton, WI · ~107 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JLM Advanced Tech. Service runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Paper making machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade B.

JLM Advanced Tech. Service: 1.5 TCR = 70% of Paper making machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JLM Advanced Tech. Service safety composite

JLM Advanced Tech. Service scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2018

JLM Advanced Tech. Service injury rate improved

JLM Advanced Tech. Service's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.7 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Appleton, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/87
  • PHOTO Concentric Maintenance
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Concentric Maintenance (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

JLM Advanced Tech. Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JLM Advanced Tech. Service averages 1.5 TCR (70% of the Paper making machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JLM Advanced Tech. Service TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.1

Where JLM Advanced Tech. Service falls in its industry

2,560 Paper making machinery repair establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 87 Paper making machinery repair employers in Wisconsin.

JLM Advanced Tech. Service (107 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate JLM Advanced Tech. Service
JLM Advanced Tech. Service (107 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

JLM Advanced Tech. Service has more employees than the Paper making machinery repair and mainte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.7 2.2 5 0 0
2016 0.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · WI · Appleton

2,560 Paper making machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 356 employers in Appleton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Concentric Maintenance 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Lift Truck Co., Inc. Br1 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR STS Operating - Denver 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gregory Poole Lift Systems- Harrisonburg 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Affiliated Construction Services, Inc. 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE P&M Leasing 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Integrity Grading & Excavating Inc. 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parking Lot Maintenance Inc 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Appleton 1,649 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center-Appleton 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Operations 1,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fox Valley Technical College (WI) 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR ACS_INDIANAPOLIS_IN 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AC Home Depot US 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 03 - Dewitt 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 43141h - Normal Il Pec 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. - Permian Infrastructure Group 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Campbellsville (Kycam) 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goldsboro Center (Ncgol) 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Marcos (Txsmr) 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.