Cellulosic plastics film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Acton Technologies

Pittston, PA · ~60 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Acton Technologies runs at 305% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cellulosic plastics film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Acton Technologies: 10.1 TCR = 305% of Cellulosic plastics film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Acton Technologies safety composite

Acton Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2024

Acton Technologies injury rate improved

Acton Technologies's TCR fell 4.8 from 9.0 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.0 · 2017=12.2 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=11.7 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=12.5 · 2023=13.8 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326113 · Pittston, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 305% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #30/30
  • PHOTO Terre Haute South
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Terre Haute South (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Acton Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Acton Technologies averages 10.1 TCR (305% of the Cellulosic plastics film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Acton Technologies TCR series: 2016=9 · 2017=12.2 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=11.7 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=12.5 · 2023=13.8 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Acton Technologies falls in its industry

303 Cellulosic plastics film and u establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 30 Cellulosic plastics film and u employers in Pennsylvania.

Acton Technologies (60 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Acton Technologies
Acton Technologies (60 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Acton Technologies has fewer employees than the Cellulosic plastics film and unlaminated median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2023 13.8 13.8 6 0 0
2022 12.5 12.5 6 0 0
2021 9.8 8.2 6 0 0
2019 11.7 11.7 6 0 0
2018 7.3 7.3 5 0 0
2017 12.2 10.7 8 0 0
2016 9.0 9.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326113 · PA · Pittston

303 Cellulosic plastics film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 96 employers in Pittston, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Terre Haute South 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Filmtech Corporation 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Extruflex North America, LLC 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flex-O-Glass, Inc. - Dixon 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE PHRG PIT 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wickersham Construction & Engineering, Inc. 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Landau Building Company 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Division #23 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pittston TJ Maxx Distribution Center 1,462 FTE
CITY-NEAR NBC Pittston Merchants, LLC 1,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime, Inc-PA 719 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2807-1449 708 FTE
NAT-TCR Howard Industries Inc. (Sandersville) 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sauer Structural, LLC 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shady Lawn Health and Rehabilitation 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Street Department 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wieland Metal Services, LLC (Carol Stream) 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE OFP 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Propak - Omaha, NE 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patrick AFB Dining 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.