Skilled nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation

Portage, PA · ~60 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation runs at 292% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation: 19.0 TCR = 292% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation safety composite

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.6

2022→2024

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation injury rate improved

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation's TCR fell 16.6 from 24.2 in 2022 to 7.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 25.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=24.2 · 2023=25.2 · 2024=7.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Portage, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.0 · 292% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #699/754
  • PHOTO Huntington Court
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Huntington Court (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation averages 19.0 TCR (292% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2022=24.2 · 2023=25.2 · 2024=7.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #699 safest of 754 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Pennsylvania.

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation (60 employees, TCR 19.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation
Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation (60 employees, TCR 19.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.6 7.6 4 0 0
2023 25.2 23.1 8 4 0
2022 24.2 21.8 6 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Portage

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 6 employers in Portage, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Huntington Court 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Joseph's Home for the Elderly 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holgate Center 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scott Health & Rehabilitaion 19.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE PHRG PIT 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wickersham Construction & Engineering, Inc. 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Landau Building Company 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Division #23 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Winds Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Portage Labor Company 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Portage Yard 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starprint Publications, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-TCR Kendall County Forest Preserve District 19.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Huntington Court 19.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Artis Senior Living of Elmhurst 19.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodland Plastics Corporation 19.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 293009-Hadley | MA | 293009 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holistic Industries, Inc 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bartlett Homes & Roofing, LLC - Utah Office 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Breezco Logistics LLC 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.