Continuing care retirement communities · South Carolina

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village

Rock Hill, SC · ~110 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade B.

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village: 2.6 TCR = 68% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village safety composite

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village: 0.9 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.35× in 2022

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village's TCR rose 3.7 from 0.9 in 2019 to 4.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Rock Hill, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #13/76
  • PHOTO Brightmore of Wilmin…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brightmore of Wilmington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village averages 2.6 TCR (68% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village TCR series: 2019=0.9 · 2020=2.3 · 2022=4.5 · BLS 3.8

Where ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 76 Continuing care retirement com employers in South Carolina.

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village (110 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village
ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village (110 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Park Point Village has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.5 0.9 5 0 0
2020 2.3 0.8 3 0 0
2019 0.9 0.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · SC · Rock Hill

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 221 employers in Rock Hill, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brightmore of Wilmington 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Focused Care at Odessa 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heatherwood 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Las Vegas 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Charleston 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Network Controls & Electric, LLC 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bericap SC, LLC 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE JR Automation Technologies, LLC Liberty, SC 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-340 1,642 FTE
CITY-NEAR 340 PIEDMONT MEDICAL CENTER 1,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rock Hill Distribution Center RHDC 1,107 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Rock Hill 1,072 FTE
NAT-TCR Dallas 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Crystal Farms RDC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 2904-ASM-MO 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SuperMax Laguna Gardens 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rivian-DSI 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Njmoo - Moonachie 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Njcrt - Carteret 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mnbla - Minneapolis 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.