Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · South Carolina

The Blake at Carnes Crossroads

Summerville, SC · ~110 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
33.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Blake at Carnes Crossroads runs at 887% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Blake at Carnes Crossroads: 33.7 TCR = 887% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Blake at Carnes Crossroads safety composite

The Blake at Carnes Crossroads scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 33.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−37.3

2020→2023

The Blake at Carnes Crossroads injury rate improved

The Blake at Carnes Crossroads's TCR fell 37.3 from 48.6 in 2020 to 11.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 131.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=48.6 · 2021=131.2 · 2022=41.2 · 2023=11.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Summerville, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 33.7 · 887% of ind

  • DART 11.3 DART
  • RANK #76/76
  • PHOTO Primrose Retirement …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Primrose Retirement Community of Jefferson City (3.8 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Blake at Carnes Crossroads in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Blake at Carnes Crossroads averages 33.7 TCR (887% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

The Blake at Carnes Crossroads TCR series: 2020=48.6 · 2021=131.2 · 2022=41.2 · 2023=11.3 · BLS 3.8

Where The Blake at Carnes Crossroads falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #76 safest of 76 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

The Blake at Carnes Crossroads (110 employees, TCR 33.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate The Blake at Carnes Crossroads
The Blake at Carnes Crossroads (110 employees, TCR 33.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Blake at Carnes Crossroads has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.3 11.3 7 0 0
2022 41.2 36.0 7 17 0
2021 131.2 96.2 5 10 0
2020 48.6 34.7 9 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · SC · Summerville

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 188 employers in Summerville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Jefferson City 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Blake at Edgewater 29.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Terrace 29.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Castle Peak Senior Care 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 451487-CHS-NORTH CHARLESTON BR 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake City Scranton Healthcare Center 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE 262857 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carolina Canners Incorporated 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thorne research - Omni one 478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scout Boats, Inc 436 FTE
CITY-NEAR Summerville Medical Center 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1037 420 FTE
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tresca Brothers Sand and Gravel 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skally's Old World Bakery Inc. 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Park Lane 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #2945 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.