Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Adamson

Atlanta, GA · ~48 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Adamson runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Adamson: 0.8 TCR = 39% of Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Adamson safety composite

Adamson scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Adamson held a steady TCR band

Adamson's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/49
  • PHOTO SA Recycling, Termin…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SA Recycling, Terminal Island (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Adamson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Adamson averages 0.8 TCR (39% of the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Adamson TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Adamson falls in its industry

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automot establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 49 Scrap materials (e.g., automot employers in Georgia.

Adamson (48 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Adamson
Adamson (48 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Adamson has more employees than the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, indus median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · GA · Atlanta

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SA Recycling, Terminal Island 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMR Eastern LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Management Ohio - Defiance Facility 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR OHCA I, LLC 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE L&M Farms of Georgia, LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant McIntosh Combine Cycle 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Airport Operating - 112 Lake Mirror Road Forest Park 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Fulton Operating 116675 Wills Road 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Altom Transport, Inc. - PASADENA 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tomahawk Operations - Kaphaem Facility 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pennichuck Water Works, Inc. - Main Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kevin Ryman, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lakeside Roofing Co., Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mason Warehouse 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Statesville Breeder Operation 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE BLN 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.