Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Pennsylvania

Kevin Ryman, Inc.

Nescopeck, PA · ~22 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kevin Ryman, Inc. runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Kevin Ryman, Inc.: 0.8 TCR = 19% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kevin Ryman, Inc. safety composite

Kevin Ryman, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kevin Ryman, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Kevin Ryman, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Nescopeck, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/172
  • PHOTO BEAUMONT TERMINAL
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BEAUMONT TERMINAL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Kevin Ryman, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kevin Ryman, Inc. averages 0.8 TCR (19% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kevin Ryman, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Kevin Ryman, Inc. falls in its industry

3,252 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 172 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in Pennsylvania.

Kevin Ryman, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kevin Ryman, Inc.
Kevin Ryman, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Kevin Ryman, Inc. has fewer employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · PA · Nescopeck

3,252 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 employers in Nescopeck, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BEAUMONT TERMINAL 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston, TX - 5220 Glenmont Dr 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Breinigsville, PA - 8001 Industrial Blvd 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ashley Distribution Service, Ltd. - Washington 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dawson's Orchards 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kuhn Orchards, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Giorgi Mushroom Farm 3 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Hope 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Endeavor Logistics Solutions LLC 851 FTE
CITY-NEAR rad mfg llc 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR NESCOPECK 21 FTE
NAT-TCR Minneapolis Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tomahawk Operations - Kaphaem Facility 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Adamson 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Czarnowski-Austell 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Newark Tank Depot 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE BEI Louisville Branch 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trident Surfacing, Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shop 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.